FMRL Blog

Exploring disruptive storytelling technology in theory and practice.

  • FMRL.com (Main Site)
  • FMRL: Pith, Marrow & Media, The True Story
  • Read DaedalusHowell.blog
    • 0
      1 Aug 2010

      Wolfram Alpha vs. Google vs. Your Brain (on drugs)

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      [caption id="attachment_2977" align="alignleft" width="208" caption="This is your brain. This is your brain on Wolfram Alpha."]
      Media_httpdhowellcomw_aqinm
      [/caption] Last month, the big brains of the "computational knowledge" world gathered in central London to explore how "advances in computational technology are unlocking knowledge assets and shaping the future." The event, dryly named the London Computational Knowledge Summit, was underwritten by Wolfram Alpha, which bills itself as a "computational knowledge engine," a tagline so catchy, they trademarked it lest it be stolen. The brainchild of scientist, inventor, author and entrepreneur Stephen Wolfram, the Alpha engine was heralded as a Google-killer upon its debut last year. That was before everyone realized that it was more of a calculator than a search engine. (Those seeking confirmation of this will note the website's favicon features an equal sign.) A year later, Google is expanding at a rate exceeding that of the universe itself, while Wolfram Alpha remains something of an online curiosity to anyone whose CV includes the phrase "liberal arts." Wolfram's own résumé, predictably, reads like that of a boy genius just one romantic spurn away from becoming a supervillain. "Beginning in his teenage years," an online bio exhorts, "Wolfram made a number of discoveries in physics and cosmology. In the early 1980s, his now-classic work on cellular automata helped launch the field of 'complexity theory.'" But wait, there's more. After Wolfram grew up, he took the 300-year-old notion that laws based on mathematical equations could be used as a means of describing the natural world and turned it into software for modeling everything under the sun, over the sun and even in the sun. The killer app, known as Mathematica, is used for modeling phenomena in fields as diverse as engineering, biotechnology and finance. So when Wolfram Alpha was launched in the spring of last year, lazy journalists and high school term-paper scribes rejoiced. Finally, the man who gave the world a plug-'n'-play way to simulate chemical processes or test financial risk models had made a tool for the rest of us! Wolfram Alpha inhaled the web's collective information into its own massive database and processes answers with an ever-evolving complement of proprietary algorithms borne of Mathematica software. What does this mean? The truth is out there, and now it's in your iPhone, thanks to the Wolfram Alpha app. Phrases like "knowledge extraction" might roll off the tongue of a character in Christopher Nolan's Inception, but they're not part of the general parlance. That's, in part, what Wolfram seeks to fix, if not in name, then in deed. He's empowering his engine's users through "natural language processing" or, specifically, by letting them speak in intuitive human terms rather than some sort of computer-speak. Remember the dark ages of the web when Boolean searches were all the rage? Such qualifiers aren't necessary here; however, a fair amount of specificity is, especially when the data entered is partial or idiosyncratic. While most human brains in the Bay Area "know" that Sonoma, Napa and Marin are counties, Wolfram Alpha only understands them as searchable terms and presents results based on a library of internal algorithms. Upon entering the query "Sonoma, Napa and Marin" for a comparative analysis of the counties, the engine assumed Marin was in Spain. Refining the query by adding "counties in California" yielded a comprehensive breakdown of the counties, and their statistical relationships to one another were presented side-by-side. The amount and range of information is beguiling, in fact overwhelming, which makes the aforementioned "knowledge extraction" a bit of a bear. After a moment's reflection on the data set, interesting observations begin to effervesce. There are nearly three times as many deaths in Sonoma County as in Napa County, though the population of Sonoma County is only double that of Napa County. Why? And where's the data on Marin County? Perhaps we can infer that no one actually dies in Marin County, which accounts for its comparatively high real estate prices. You see, inasmuch as the engine can slice a near infinite amount of information like a Ginsu blade, it can't tell you what it means. The ability to infer, to extrapolate and perceive meaningful relationships between the data remains a strictly human occupation—at least for now. Or, as one might say, you can lead a geek to Wolfram but you can't make him think.
      • views
      • Tweet
    • 0
      26 Jul 2010

      SEO as a Networking Tool

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Media_httpdhowellcomw_ogggf
      In no way do I purport to understand the alchemy of search engine optimization – that arcane conflux of meta tags, algorithmic jockeying and ritual sacrifice to Google that produces page rankings and spankings in equal measure. Well, who knows if it's equal – that sort of proprietary information lives in some server barn in Mountain View, CA. This much I do know: I invested a modicum of effort in upping SEO on DHowell.com (the original incarnation of FMRL.com) with eye to ranking favorably with such terms as “branded entertainment,” “transmedia” and my own keyword cocktail “branded transmedia” and have enjoyed positive results both online and off. By flicking a few switches on the SEO-friendly Thesis Theme for Wordpress and going over the site with the fine grit web tools Google offers, I was pleased to receive an email from San Francisco expat entrepreneur Dave Watson, who works in similar spheres as I in the Czech Republic. Apparently, Watson Googled something akin to “transmedia blogs” and found DHowell Media Group (now FMRL), which led to an invitation to coffee at Napa’s Oxbow Market while he visited the states. There, we swapped notes on our shared niche, talked shop and hatched fiendish schemes. SEO as a networking tool – what's next? CRM for dating?
      • views
      • Tweet
    • 0
      5 Feb 2010

      Web 3.0, the Pedantic Web

      • Edit
      • Delete
      • Tags
      • Autopost
      Media_httpdhowellcomw_jirge
      No sooner has popular culture digested the term “Web 2.0” than the ante is upped by the next generation of the World Wide Web. Behold, “Web 3.0.” Um, yeah. This unfortunate protologism, doomed to eternal comparison to its pithy predecessor, proves the adage that “Good technologists borrow, great technologists steal and then add 1.” Also known as the “semantic web,” Web 3.0 presently has several working definitions, the most salient of which seems to be web godfather Sir Tim Berners-Lee’s suggestion that a semantic web will enable “the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives” and “machines talking to machines.” Meaning, data presented on the web and necessarily meant to be interpreted by humans, but inscrutable to machines, will soon become scrutable. Though the notion of machines talking to each other about one’s web queries, sundry database entries and general arcane of our digital lives, might lead to a more expeditious online experience, it may also foment a paranoia of the sort described in a Philip K. Dick novel. Especially if the machines are chatty and gossip-prone. Interestingly, the semantic web’s etymological ancestor, Web 2.0, was coined by Sonoma County’s own Tim O’Reilly, the open-source maven, publisher and founder of O’Reilly Media based in Sebastopol. O’Reilly chose the term to describe the emergence of post-crash web-based businesses and the commonalities they share (social, collaborative, no Fusbol game in the foyer) as the raison d’etre for a conference. “Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as ‘Web 2.0’ might make sense?” O’Reilly wrote in 2005 post entitled What is Web 2.0 archived on OReilly.com. “We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.” So too was born an infectious meme that has seen the “2.0” appliqué on everything from healthcare reform to sex (incidentally, the Sex 2.0 conference, explores the “intersection of social media, feminism, and sexuality” returns to Seattle this May). In the half-decade since O’Reilly’s coinage, culture has undergone something of a digital renaissance (think Wikipedia, Facebook, Twitter) and his Web 2.0 Conference is now the annual Web 2.0 Summit. So, how is it then that New York-based Mediabistro, a trade group that bills itself as “the premier content, career, and community resource for media professionals” came to host the so-called Web 3.0 Conference last week? Clearly, something has gotten out of sequence. That is, unless Web 3.0 involves time travel and paid us a visit here in the present to show us the future with a stack of PowerPoint slides. Gimmicky, sure, but revealing nevertheless – about half of the seminars and presentations were presented by marketers about leveraging the semantic web, which some hope will emulate a kind of artificial intelligence, to target consumers. “Ka-ching 3.0” might have been a more apt title for the conference (better lock that in – the KaChing Button, an iPhone app that makes a cash register sound for the currency of your choice, is already up to version 1.0.3). Given the Sonoma provenance of Web 2.0, it was somehow apropos that its unrelated pseudo-sequel was held at the Hyatt Regency in Santa Clara, where the conference rooms are dubbed “Sonoma,” “Napa” and “Mendocino.” Adorning the walls are tilt-shift prints, photo-collages and other digitally-produced eye-candy designed to evoke a Silicon Valley aesthetic, despite its wine country pretensions. And wherefore Wine 2.0? That conference happened in New York last November. In the coming years perhaps we will experience Web 4.0, which will find its comeuppance when Webs 2.0 and 3.0 join forces and become Web 5.0. Web 4.0 will respond by rehabbing Web 1.0 out of its post-bust stupor (so-named the way the Great War became World War I) and attempt to beat Web 5.0 at it’s own game. An accord will ensue and all parties will reform together as simply The Web – at which point it will become sentient and enslave us all. You know, if it hasn’t already.
      • views
      • Tweet
    • Search

    • Sites I Like

      • Future Journalism Project
    • Tags

      • Lab Blog
      • Boho
      • Cinemania
      • Publish or Perish
      • FAIL File
      • Gadgets & Gadflies
      • Daedalus Howell
      • Film Lab
      • Crowd-Cloud
      • google
      • ipad
      • (Un)Sung Music
      • Brand Camp
      • Killer Apps
      • amazon
      • ebook
      • Social Media Butterfly
      • apple
      • facebook
      • Broadcastrati
      • Docs
      • Shall we play a Game?
      • Video Killed the Radio Star
      • fail
      • branded entertainment
      • kindle fire
      • music video
      • transmedia
      • twitter
      • Ben Huh
      • Dmitra Smith
      • Manifestos
      • New York Times
      • R&D
      • Rupert Murdoch
      • Siri
      • This Is Spinal Tap
      • Unsolicted Advice
      • With Your Host
      • adaptation
      • anonymous
      • comcast
      • ebooks
      • filmmaking
      • hal
      • iphone 4s
      • kindle
      • netflix
      • newspapers
      • online journalism
      • sonoma
      • star wars
      • static people
      • zombies
      • /b/
      • 1350 AM
      • 1950s
      • 1977
      • 2001
      • 4-koma
      • 4chan
      • AT&T
      • Alex Komarov
      • Andrew Gurland
      • Andy Cohen
      • Andy Warhol
      • Angels & Angles
      • Animation Station
      • Anthony WeinerAnthony Weiner
      • Apollo 18
      • Artists include Anthony Discenza
      • Ashley Bell
      • Battle Ship
      • Berkeley Books
      • Best Worst Movie
      • Birdemic
      • Black Eyed Peas
      • Blackwater
      • Blair Witch Project
      • Blog
      • Brian Goldner
      • Brian Miller
      • Buzzy Martin
      • CYC
      • Candy Land
      • Chase
      • Christian Right
      • Christopher Guest
      • Clear Channel
      • Comix
      • Computational Knowledge Summit
      • CreateSpace
      • Creative Commons
      • Culture Jammers
      • Cut the cord
      • Czech Replublic
      • DIY
      • Daniel Walker
      • Dave Watson
    • Archive

      • 2012 (2)
        • March (1)
        • February (1)
      • 2011 (25)
        • December (18)
        • November (3)
        • October (2)
        • June (2)
    • Obox Design
  • FMRL Blog

    Writer and producer at FMRL where we explore new ways of making media for fans and brands.

    Columns: Bohemian.com | SonomaNews.com

    My latest:
    "I Heart Sonoma: How to Live & Drink in Wine Country" available now at an eBookstore near you.

    1278 Views
  • Get Updates

    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterLinkedIn